NRDC: White House Interferes with EPA Scientists' Analysis of Toxic Chemicals
Poses Risk to Public Health
WASHINGTON -- June 12, 2008 – A new White House policy deals a crippling blow to the ability of the scientific staff of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to identify chemicals that pose the greatest risk to public health, potentially putting millions of people at risk, according to public health experts at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
At issue is the interference with EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program. The new White House policy will delay scientific assessments of chemicals’ health risks and hinder opportunities for public comment and scientific debate. IRIS evaluates the risks of hundreds of toxic chemicals and their potential impacts on human health. While not a regulatory program, IRIS assessments are relied upon by EPA program offices and states (as well as territorial, tribal and international governments) for setting standards for drinking water, air pollution and toxic waste cleanups.
Dr. Linda Greer, Ph.D., director of NRDC’s public health program, will testify today before the House Science Committee’s Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee on the Bush administration’s recent actions to politicize and inject secrecy into EPA’s process for identifying the health risks posed by toxic chemicals.
The following is a statement from Dr. Greer, concerning EPA’s IRIS program and the potential impacts if the Administration’s actions are not reversed by Congress:
“These changes are yet another escalation of the administration’s war on science and public health that has gone on for nearly eight years. The recent changes to the IRIS process are part of a much broader agenda to sacrifice public health protections and limit public understanding of the risk of toxic chemicals to benefit polluting industries and federal agencies. By attempting to weaken the IRIS process, the administration has zeroed in on one of the earliest and most fundamental steps in protecting public health, in which EPA’s scientists identify the health risks posed by exposure to certain chemicals.”
Dr. Greer’s full testimony can be found at: http://docs.nrdc.org/health/
Source: NRDC
Scroll down for related articles:
Related articles
- 2008-06-16: NRDC: White House Interferes with EPA Scientists' Analysis of Toxic Chemicals
- 2009-06-22: Montana Gov., DEQ, and DPHHS Praise Libby Public Health Emergency Declaration
- 2008-01-17: Groups Challenge EPA Regulation that Allows Pesticide Testing on Humans
- 2009-10-28: EPA Proposes Tightening Standards for Lead-Safe Renovation Practices and Lead Paint Dust to Protect Children
- 2009-10-20: EPA: Wipe Out Lead Poisoning
- 2009-10-01: Senator Lautenberg Applauds Breakthrough EPA Principles On Chemical Reform, Prepares Bill for Introduction
- 2009-05-18: Vice President Biden Announces Nearly $100 Million In Recovery Act Funds To Clean Up Dangerous Lead In Housing
- 2009-03-13: New Coal Plants Would Create Nearly 18 Million Tons of Waste Annually
- 2009-03-13: Texas Worst State for Toxic Coal-Ash Waste
- 2009-02-11: EPA Plugs Loophole to Stop Industrial Polluters and Reduce Smog
- 2008-04-01: House Oversight Committee Chairman Waxman Statement on EPA’s Final Rule on Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting
- 2009-11-04: EPA adds U.S. Magnesium to Superfund site list